6 Technologies for De-Humanizing War from InfoWars.com

10 09 2011

Despite the escalation of war around the globe affecting millions of people, the process of battle is becoming increasingly de-personalized.  This very well could be a plan implemented to create unthinking and unblinking battalions to do the bidding of warmongers as humanity begins to resist their machinations.  At the very least, the process of de-personalization can create a scenario where avoidance of war is minimized.

With the cooperation of major defense contractors, the landscape of war is quickly beginning to resemble the fictional Skynet Global Digital Defense Network.  We seem to be on the cusp of a new future that gives every indication that humans are gradually being phased out, much like they already have been on the manufacturing assembly line.

Aerial Drones: Surveillance drones and weaponized drones have taken center stage, bringing death from above via remote control, often from thousands of miles away.  The video game culture surely has lent a hand in creating the disconnect from buttons pushed and real lives lost.  The latest offering are backpack-sized suicide drones that can fly autonomously, or via remote control.

Robots and Unmanned Ground Vehicles: Human troops on the ground already have partnered with thousands of robots to secure roadside bombs, conduct surveillance missions, and serve as battle-ready auxiliaries or autonomous agents.  Unmanned tank turrets have been introduced to strafe the enemy, as well as an assortment of vehicles and even navy vessels to patrol the seas without on-board operators.

Cargo delivery: Lockheed Martin has just announced a resounding success with their K-MAX system of “autonomous and remote control” helicopters that can re-supply troops.  This cargo delivery system could potentially merge with robotic forces on the ground, completely eliminating the need for humans on either end.

Nanotech: The miniaturization of drones seems to have no end.  Literal swarms of cyborg insects can surveil the most impenetrable locations.  With President Obama’s 2011 Nanotechnology Initiative (pdf) having been fully funded, this has been signed on as the future of non-human war.  DARPA has tested nano-enhanced hybrids for body and vehicle armor, paving the way for the likelihood of full-fledged human augmentation to merge nature and machine.

Cyborgs: Modern science has merged with the unending military budget to make the cyborgs of science fiction a near-term reality.  Insect cyborgs are well-established as a recognizance tool, while  Bullet-proof skin will augment any humans that might be left on the battlefield.  Human augmentation has reached a new level with theXOS exo-skeleton that creates a real-world Iron Man with superhuman strength and abilities.Augmented Cognition Technology programs have been spearheaded by defense contracting giant Honeywell, which offers a full-spectrum computer-body interface to analyze and potentially program soldiers’ physical and mental states via computer.

Computers and Cyberwar: The merging of the virtual landscape with the real is where humans could become redundant.  The Department of Defense and Homeland Security have made it clear thatcyber terrorism is the next great threat.  Furthermore, they have announced that the cyber battlefield will be a representation of the real one, with computer attacks prompting real-world response.  This could be the last step of full integration, as computers and communications networks connect in oneoverall web of attack and response — with humanity left only to wonder how things could have spiraled so far out of control.  Are we facing future wars conducted only between drones?  How long before their autonomous capabilities go too far?

At the very least, our real world is beginning to dangerously resemble a computer game with the players residing far from the battlefield.  Classified, black-budget military research and capabilities are many decades ahead of public awareness.  So, while we do know that the reality of non-human war is here . . . we can only imagine what comes next.





Pentagon Snoops Using Facebook and Twitter

3 08 2011

The New York Times and the Washington Post have posted articles detailing a plan by the Pentagon to detect and track popular ideas on social networks. They are not interested in what people think about Lady Gaga or the latest cooking recipes. In 2005, it was reported that the Pentagon was adding anti-war groups and individuals to a terrorist database. A Defense Department document leaked to NBC provided a “first inside look at how the U.S. military has stepped up intelligence collection inside this country since 9/11, which now includes the monitoring of peaceful anti-war and counter-military recruitment groups.” Northcom also has a unit dedicated to snooping on political activists. In 2002, the Pentagon established CIFA, Counterintelligence Field Activity, by directive. Its size and budget were classified. CIFA created a database, TALON (Threat and Local Observation Notice), to keep track of antiwar activists and individuals opposed to invading and bombing small defenseless countries. After a spate of bad PR, the government said CIFA was to be dismantled. It was later revealed that its operations were outsourced and privatized. The Washington Post admits the DARPA – the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency – plan to hire programmers and researchers to build software to track “popular ideas” on social networks is political. The plan “makes a certain amount of sense, if you think about how Twitter, Facebook and other social media networks have been used to broadcast the ideas of revolutionaries, protesters and other political figures over the past few years,” writes Hayley Tsukayama. And, as the report highlights, DARPA could also use the social networks to identify threats. It suggests, for example, that the agency could look into incidences of several people in the same area posting messages about rumors that a wanted individual is hiding nearby. Or where the next demonstration against the Federal Reserve will be held so agents provocateurs and informers can be dispatched. “Social networks can allow the military not only to follow but also to shape the action,” writes David Streitfeld for the New York Times. In 2009, the Pentagon released a “Force Protection Advisory” about “planned protests at all Federal Reserve Banks and office locations within the United States.” The “advisory” went out to Northcom and the FBI. On November 22, 2008, Alex Jones led a rally at the Federal Reserve Bank in Dallas Texas. The Dallas protest is specifically mentioned in the official Army document. Ron Paul’s brother was also in attendance.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.